My Shingle

Who’s paying this ABA Cost?

by Carolyn Elefant on June 28, 2006 · 2 comments

in MyShingle Solo

Print Friendly

OK, as regular readers know, I’m not a huge fan of the ABA. So I didn’t feel badly to learn about this somewhat underpublicized announcement (6/23/06) about the ABA’s agreement to pay $185,000 for violating a 1996 antitrust consent decree.  From the  Department of Justice press release:

The consent decree prohibited the ABA from misusing the law school accreditation process. The Department also filed a proposed order and a stipulation in which the ABA acknowledges the violations alleged in the Department’s petition and agrees to reimburse the United States $185,000 in fees and costs incurred in the Department’s investigation. The proposed order is subject to court approval.

I guess if ABA dues go up next year, we’ll know why.  Seriously, who pays when the ABA gets itself into this type of a mess? 

Related posts:

  1. What’s the Hourly Cost of Running Your Office?
  2. Lawyer Sues Clients for Money; Not Sure of What to Make of All of This
  3. Legal Writing Expert Lisa Solomon Opines on ABA Opinion on Outsourcing
  4. MyShingle Is Proud to Be Part of the 18 Percent
  5. The ABA Makes A Play for Solos, but Should Solos Play With the ABA?
  • http://www.antitrustreview.com/archives/571 Antitrust Review

    Random Walk Down The Blogosphere

    An all blog edition:
    The Google Copyright Blog on KinderStart.coms antitrust lawsuit against Google: Is it really anticompetitive for Google to disapprove of another search engine that engages in shady business like this by removing it f…

  • http://www.antitrustreview.com/archives/571 Antitrust Review

    Random Walk Down The Blogosphere

    An all blog edition:
    The Google Copyright Blog on KinderStart.coms antitrust lawsuit against Google: Is it really anticompetitive for Google to disapprove of another search engine that engages in shady business like this by removing it f…

Previous post:

Next post: