Comments on: New Orleans Solos, One Year Later http://myshingle.com/2006/08/articles/myshingle-solo/new-orleans-solos-one-year-later/ Great Things Come in Small [Law] Practices! Tue, 15 May 2012 15:19:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: RJON@HowToMakeItRain.com http://myshingle.com/2006/08/articles/myshingle-solo/new-orleans-solos-one-year-later/#comment-2183 RJON@HowToMakeItRain.com Tue, 05 Sep 2006 19:14:12 +0000 http://174.120.83.8/~sh1ngl3/2006/08/articles/uncategorized/new-orleans-solos-one-year-later/#comment-2183 ElGuapo, Thank you for your reply. I really appreciate the candid feedback and the opportunity to explain myself in order to hopefully, clear-up any misunderstandings. I've tried to respond to your comment one piece at a time: <b>"My Rainmaking Client"</b> I could have said "some lady I know" but then that would have been sort of strange that she would know anything about my background to refer a lawyer she knows to me for help in finding a job, don't you think? I could have said "a client" - like so many other participants do when the relationship is relevant to the story, but again, that would have been misleading because I have never provided legal services to the person who made the introduction. And I suppose I could have just excluded the whole part about how I was introduced to the lawyer who lost her firm and her job in Katrina and left it to everyone's imagination how a total stranger happened call me for help finding a new job in a strange city. So I stated the facts. <b>The Last Two Lines</b> I am an active participant in this and several other blogs. In many cases, the opinions I express or the experiences I have, suggest a conclusion or a way of approaching an issue that is different from those of the other commenters, and sometimes even different from the host who made the orginal post. As an aside, I generally refrain from making "me too" comments when I am in agreement with a post or the direction in which a discussion is headed, which may be why I'm so often on the "other side" of issues. I think if you will be fair in your assessment of my participation on this blog though, you must agree that I always express such ideas, opinions and perspectives with respect, never seeking to publicly embarrass anyone. Furthermore, I take great pride in the fact that I always go out of my way to explain the reasoning or experiences upon which my statements are based. Now, if I were to express a minority opinion on a controversial subject like, Flat Fee vs. Hourly Billing, as just one example and I simply identify myself as a solo practitioner, then some other solo practitioner might read the nine other statements in favor of hourly billing and disregard my lone argument in favor of flat fees. That same solo practitioner however, if he or she were to be aware of the fact that I am basing my statement not only on my own experience, but on the experiences of several hundreds of lawyers whom I have helped to successfully implement flat fee billing arrangements...well then, that hypothetical solo practitioner may think-twice about whether that one guy with the minority opinion may actually have a valid point based on more than just one lawyer's sole opinion/experience and evaluate his or her options differently. ElGuapo, I am not criticizing you for choosing to protect your identity when you blog. I approach blogging differently though. Not better or worse, just different. I post with my full name, e-mail address and contact information. Sometimes I get personal e-mails expressing disagreement with the things I say. Sometimes I get compliments too. But I don't hide from the fact that I am in the business of helping lawyers with their businesses. Nor do I seek to hide that fact from my fellow bloggers. Rather, I put it all out there in order to help anyone who wants to consider them, better evaluate my perspectives, ideas, advice and opinions. I don't know how else to do that without telling people what I do. <b>"If you are not posting here to promote yourself. . . "</b> First of all, I do not accept the premise that there is anything inherently wrong with promoting oneself. I trust that you do not get offended when you watch the evening news, or read the newspaper, or attend every single bar function or CLE program you've ever been to. Equally, I doubt it offends you that there are like fifty links permanently displayed that lead to various lawyers' own personal websites on this, and many other blogs. I include a link to my website in order to help readers better evaluate my comments, and yes, to promote myself. If my comments are relevant and helpful -which by virtue of the fact that you cricized me for everything else BUT that, leads me to think you agree that they are - then why is my self-promotion any different from every other source of information available in the world? Respectfully, Some guy who may or may not know what he is talking about. ElGuapo,
Thank you for your reply. I really appreciate the candid feedback and the opportunity to explain myself in order to hopefully, clear-up any misunderstandings. I’ve tried to respond to your comment one piece at a time:
“My Rainmaking Client”
I could have said “some lady I know” but then that would have been sort of strange that she would know anything about my background to refer a lawyer she knows to me for help in finding a job, don’t you think? I could have said “a client” – like so many other participants do when the relationship is relevant to the story, but again, that would have been misleading because I have never provided legal services to the person who made the introduction. And I suppose I could have just excluded the whole part about how I was introduced to the lawyer who lost her firm and her job in Katrina and left it to everyone’s imagination how a total stranger happened call me for help finding a new job in a strange city. So I stated the facts.
The Last Two Lines
I am an active participant in this and several other blogs. In many cases, the opinions I express or the experiences I have, suggest a conclusion or a way of approaching an issue that is different from those of the other commenters, and sometimes even different from the host who made the orginal post. As an aside, I generally refrain from making “me too” comments when I am in agreement with a post or the direction in which a discussion is headed, which may be why I’m so often on the “other side” of issues.
I think if you will be fair in your assessment of my participation on this blog though, you must agree that I always express such ideas, opinions and perspectives with respect, never seeking to publicly embarrass anyone.
Furthermore, I take great pride in the fact that I always go out of my way to explain the reasoning or experiences upon which my statements are based. Now, if I were to express a minority opinion on a controversial subject like, Flat Fee vs. Hourly Billing, as just one example and I simply identify myself as a solo practitioner, then some other solo practitioner might read the nine other statements in favor of hourly billing and disregard my lone argument in favor of flat fees.
That same solo practitioner however, if he or she were to be aware of the fact that I am basing my statement not only on my own experience, but on the experiences of several hundreds of lawyers whom I have helped to successfully implement flat fee billing arrangements…well then, that hypothetical solo practitioner may think-twice about whether that one guy with the minority opinion may actually have a valid point based on more than just one lawyer’s sole opinion/experience and evaluate his or her options differently.
ElGuapo, I am not criticizing you for choosing to protect your identity when you blog. I approach blogging differently though. Not better or worse, just different. I post with my full name, e-mail address and contact information. Sometimes I get personal e-mails expressing disagreement with the things I say. Sometimes I get compliments too. But I don’t hide from the fact that I am in the business of helping lawyers with their businesses. Nor do I seek to hide that fact from my fellow bloggers. Rather, I put it all out there in order to help anyone who wants to consider them, better evaluate my perspectives, ideas, advice and opinions. I don’t know how else to do that without telling people what I do.
“If you are not posting here to promote yourself. . . “
First of all, I do not accept the premise that there is anything inherently wrong with promoting oneself. I trust that you do not get offended when you watch the evening news, or read the newspaper, or attend every single bar function or CLE program you’ve ever been to. Equally, I doubt it offends you that there are like fifty links permanently displayed that lead to various lawyers’ own personal websites on this, and many other blogs.
I include a link to my website in order to help readers better evaluate my comments, and yes, to promote myself. If my comments are relevant and helpful -which by virtue of the fact that you cricized me for everything else BUT that, leads me to think you agree that they are – then why is my self-promotion any different from every other source of information available in the world?
Respectfully,
Some guy who may or may not know what he is talking about.

]]> By: RJON@HowToMakeItRain.com http://myshingle.com/2006/08/articles/myshingle-solo/new-orleans-solos-one-year-later/#comment-6897 RJON@HowToMakeItRain.com Tue, 05 Sep 2006 19:14:00 +0000 http://174.120.83.8/~sh1ngl3/2006/08/articles/uncategorized/new-orleans-solos-one-year-later/#comment-6897 ElGuapo, Thank you for your reply. I really appreciate the candid feedback and the opportunity to explain myself in order to hopefully, clear-up any misunderstandings. I've tried to respond to your comment one piece at a time: <b>"My Rainmaking Client"</b> I could have said "some lady I know" but then that would have been sort of strange that she would know anything about my background to refer a lawyer she knows to me for help in finding a job, don't you think? I could have said "a client" - like so many other participants do when the relationship is relevant to the story, but again, that would have been misleading because I have never provided legal services to the person who made the introduction. And I suppose I could have just excluded the whole part about how I was introduced to the lawyer who lost her firm and her job in Katrina and left it to everyone's imagination how a total stranger happened call me for help finding a new job in a strange city. So I stated the facts. <b>The Last Two Lines</b> I am an active participant in this and several other blogs. In many cases, the opinions I express or the experiences I have, suggest a conclusion or a way of approaching an issue that is different from those of the other commenters, and sometimes even different from the host who made the orginal post. As an aside, I generally refrain from making "me too" comments when I am in agreement with a post or the direction in which a discussion is headed, which may be why I'm so often on the "other side" of issues. I think if you will be fair in your assessment of my participation on this blog though, you must agree that I always express such ideas, opinions and perspectives with respect, never seeking to publicly embarrass anyone. Furthermore, I take great pride in the fact that I always go out of my way to explain the reasoning or experiences upon which my statements are based. Now, if I were to express a minority opinion on a controversial subject like, Flat Fee vs. Hourly Billing, as just one example and I simply identify myself as a solo practitioner, then some other solo practitioner might read the nine other statements in favor of hourly billing and disregard my lone argument in favor of flat fees. That same solo practitioner however, if he or she were to be aware of the fact that I am basing my statement not only on my own experience, but on the experiences of several hundreds of lawyers whom I have helped to successfully implement flat fee billing arrangements...well then, that hypothetical solo practitioner may think-twice about whether that one guy with the minority opinion may actually have a valid point based on more than just one lawyer's sole opinion/experience and evaluate his or her options differently. ElGuapo, I am not criticizing you for choosing to protect your identity when you blog. I approach blogging differently though. Not better or worse, just different. I post with my full name, e-mail address and contact information. Sometimes I get personal e-mails expressing disagreement with the things I say. Sometimes I get compliments too. But I don't hide from the fact that I am in the business of helping lawyers with their businesses. Nor do I seek to hide that fact from my fellow bloggers. Rather, I put it all out there in order to help anyone who wants to consider them, better evaluate my perspectives, ideas, advice and opinions. I don't know how else to do that without telling people what I do. <b>"If you are not posting here to promote yourself. . . "</b> First of all, I do not accept the premise that there is anything inherently wrong with promoting oneself. I trust that you do not get offended when you watch the evening news, or read the newspaper, or attend every single bar function or CLE program you've ever been to. Equally, I doubt it offends you that there are like fifty links permanently displayed that lead to various lawyers' own personal websites on this, and many other blogs. I include a link to my website in order to help readers better evaluate my comments, and yes, to promote myself. If my comments are relevant and helpful -which by virtue of the fact that you cricized me for everything else BUT that, leads me to think you agree that they are - then why is my self-promotion any different from every other source of information available in the world? Respectfully, Some guy who may or may not know what he is talking about. ElGuapo,
Thank you for your reply. I really appreciate the candid feedback and the opportunity to explain myself in order to hopefully, clear-up any misunderstandings. I’ve tried to respond to your comment one piece at a time:
“My Rainmaking Client”
I could have said “some lady I know” but then that would have been sort of strange that she would know anything about my background to refer a lawyer she knows to me for help in finding a job, don’t you think? I could have said “a client” – like so many other participants do when the relationship is relevant to the story, but again, that would have been misleading because I have never provided legal services to the person who made the introduction. And I suppose I could have just excluded the whole part about how I was introduced to the lawyer who lost her firm and her job in Katrina and left it to everyone’s imagination how a total stranger happened call me for help finding a new job in a strange city. So I stated the facts.
The Last Two Lines
I am an active participant in this and several other blogs. In many cases, the opinions I express or the experiences I have, suggest a conclusion or a way of approaching an issue that is different from those of the other commenters, and sometimes even different from the host who made the orginal post. As an aside, I generally refrain from making “me too” comments when I am in agreement with a post or the direction in which a discussion is headed, which may be why I’m so often on the “other side” of issues.
I think if you will be fair in your assessment of my participation on this blog though, you must agree that I always express such ideas, opinions and perspectives with respect, never seeking to publicly embarrass anyone.
Furthermore, I take great pride in the fact that I always go out of my way to explain the reasoning or experiences upon which my statements are based. Now, if I were to express a minority opinion on a controversial subject like, Flat Fee vs. Hourly Billing, as just one example and I simply identify myself as a solo practitioner, then some other solo practitioner might read the nine other statements in favor of hourly billing and disregard my lone argument in favor of flat fees.
That same solo practitioner however, if he or she were to be aware of the fact that I am basing my statement not only on my own experience, but on the experiences of several hundreds of lawyers whom I have helped to successfully implement flat fee billing arrangements…well then, that hypothetical solo practitioner may think-twice about whether that one guy with the minority opinion may actually have a valid point based on more than just one lawyer’s sole opinion/experience and evaluate his or her options differently.
ElGuapo, I am not criticizing you for choosing to protect your identity when you blog. I approach blogging differently though. Not better or worse, just different. I post with my full name, e-mail address and contact information. Sometimes I get personal e-mails expressing disagreement with the things I say. Sometimes I get compliments too. But I don’t hide from the fact that I am in the business of helping lawyers with their businesses. Nor do I seek to hide that fact from my fellow bloggers. Rather, I put it all out there in order to help anyone who wants to consider them, better evaluate my perspectives, ideas, advice and opinions. I don’t know how else to do that without telling people what I do.
“If you are not posting here to promote yourself. . . “
First of all, I do not accept the premise that there is anything inherently wrong with promoting oneself. I trust that you do not get offended when you watch the evening news, or read the newspaper, or attend every single bar function or CLE program you’ve ever been to. Equally, I doubt it offends you that there are like fifty links permanently displayed that lead to various lawyers’ own personal websites on this, and many other blogs.
I include a link to my website in order to help readers better evaluate my comments, and yes, to promote myself. If my comments are relevant and helpful -which by virtue of the fact that you cricized me for everything else BUT that, leads me to think you agree that they are – then why is my self-promotion any different from every other source of information available in the world?
Respectfully,
Some guy who may or may not know what he is talking about.

]]> By: elguapo http://myshingle.com/2006/08/articles/myshingle-solo/new-orleans-solos-one-year-later/#comment-2182 elguapo Tue, 05 Sep 2006 18:00:15 +0000 http://174.120.83.8/~sh1ngl3/2006/08/articles/uncategorized/new-orleans-solos-one-year-later/#comment-2182 "What about my comment was self-promoting or offensive to you?" Ummm, the last 2 lines. Also the fact that you specifically mentioned helping "a Rainmaking client." These things strike me as gratuitous to your story. I challenge you to post on this blog without linking to your web site or otherwise mentioning whatever it is that you are selling. If you are not posting here to promote yourself, then you shouldn't have a problem doing that. Just my humble opinion. “What about my comment was self-promoting or offensive to you?”
Ummm, the last 2 lines.
Also the fact that you specifically mentioned helping “a Rainmaking client.”
These things strike me as gratuitous to your story.
I challenge you to post on this blog without linking to your web site or otherwise mentioning whatever it is that you are selling.
If you are not posting here to promote yourself, then you shouldn’t have a problem doing that.
Just my humble opinion.

]]> By: elguapo http://myshingle.com/2006/08/articles/myshingle-solo/new-orleans-solos-one-year-later/#comment-6896 elguapo Tue, 05 Sep 2006 18:00:00 +0000 http://174.120.83.8/~sh1ngl3/2006/08/articles/uncategorized/new-orleans-solos-one-year-later/#comment-6896 "What about my comment was self-promoting or offensive to you?" Ummm, the last 2 lines. Also the fact that you specifically mentioned helping "a Rainmaking client." These things strike me as gratuitous to your story. I challenge you to post on this blog without linking to your web site or otherwise mentioning whatever it is that you are selling. If you are not posting here to promote yourself, then you shouldn't have a problem doing that. Just my humble opinion. “What about my comment was self-promoting or offensive to you?”
Ummm, the last 2 lines.
Also the fact that you specifically mentioned helping “a Rainmaking client.”
These things strike me as gratuitous to your story.
I challenge you to post on this blog without linking to your web site or otherwise mentioning whatever it is that you are selling.
If you are not posting here to promote yourself, then you shouldn’t have a problem doing that.
Just my humble opinion.

]]> By: RJON@HowToMakeItRain.com http://myshingle.com/2006/08/articles/myshingle-solo/new-orleans-solos-one-year-later/#comment-2181 RJON@HowToMakeItRain.com Tue, 05 Sep 2006 12:59:56 +0000 http://174.120.83.8/~sh1ngl3/2006/08/articles/uncategorized/new-orleans-solos-one-year-later/#comment-2181 ElGuapo, I helped a lawyer get a job in a different city after Hurricane Katrina destroyed her law firm by destroying its client base. I'm quite proud of that fact. What about my comment was self-promoting or offensive to you? If I were in the business of placing lawyers in jobs, I guess I would have to concede your point. Or even if I was in the business of helping law firms prepare for or recover from natural disasters, I'd see your point too. My business has nothing to do with helping lawyers to find new jobs in new cities. I thought that since the original post on the anniversary of Katrina talked about how lawyers from N.O. are coping one year later, it might be of some interest to other readers of the blog to know two lawyers' stories: The lawyer who I helped, and how I experienced Katrina through helping her. I'm not trying to be argumentative, but when you make a public statement about someone mis-using a great resource like this blog, and especially when you make a public call for censure, I think you need to be prepared to back that up. Respectfully, RJON ROBINS www.HowToMakeItRain.com ElGuapo,
I helped a lawyer get a job in a different city after Hurricane Katrina destroyed her law firm by destroying its client base. I’m quite proud of that fact.
What about my comment was self-promoting or offensive to you?
If I were in the business of placing lawyers in jobs, I guess I would have to concede your point. Or even if I was in the business of helping law firms prepare for or recover from natural disasters, I’d see your point too. My business has nothing to do with helping lawyers to find new jobs in new cities.
I thought that since the original post on the anniversary of Katrina talked about how lawyers from N.O. are coping one year later, it might be of some interest to other readers of the blog to know two lawyers’ stories: The lawyer who I helped, and how I experienced Katrina through helping her.
I’m not trying to be argumentative, but when you make a public statement about someone mis-using a great resource like this blog, and especially when you make a public call for censure, I think you need to be prepared to back that up.
Respectfully,
RJON ROBINS
http://www.HowToMakeItRain.com

]]> By: RJON@HowToMakeItRain.com http://myshingle.com/2006/08/articles/myshingle-solo/new-orleans-solos-one-year-later/#comment-6895 RJON@HowToMakeItRain.com Tue, 05 Sep 2006 12:59:00 +0000 http://174.120.83.8/~sh1ngl3/2006/08/articles/uncategorized/new-orleans-solos-one-year-later/#comment-6895 ElGuapo, I helped a lawyer get a job in a different city after Hurricane Katrina destroyed her law firm by destroying its client base. I'm quite proud of that fact. What about my comment was self-promoting or offensive to you? If I were in the business of placing lawyers in jobs, I guess I would have to concede your point. Or even if I was in the business of helping law firms prepare for or recover from natural disasters, I'd see your point too. My business has nothing to do with helping lawyers to find new jobs in new cities. I thought that since the original post on the anniversary of Katrina talked about how lawyers from N.O. are coping one year later, it might be of some interest to other readers of the blog to know two lawyers' stories: The lawyer who I helped, and how I experienced Katrina through helping her. I'm not trying to be argumentative, but when you make a public statement about someone mis-using a great resource like this blog, and especially when you make a public call for censure, I think you need to be prepared to back that up. Respectfully, RJON ROBINS www.HowToMakeItRain.com ElGuapo,
I helped a lawyer get a job in a different city after Hurricane Katrina destroyed her law firm by destroying its client base. I’m quite proud of that fact.
What about my comment was self-promoting or offensive to you?
If I were in the business of placing lawyers in jobs, I guess I would have to concede your point. Or even if I was in the business of helping law firms prepare for or recover from natural disasters, I’d see your point too. My business has nothing to do with helping lawyers to find new jobs in new cities.
I thought that since the original post on the anniversary of Katrina talked about how lawyers from N.O. are coping one year later, it might be of some interest to other readers of the blog to know two lawyers’ stories: The lawyer who I helped, and how I experienced Katrina through helping her.
I’m not trying to be argumentative, but when you make a public statement about someone mis-using a great resource like this blog, and especially when you make a public call for censure, I think you need to be prepared to back that up.
Respectfully,
RJON ROBINS
http://www.HowToMakeItRain.com

]]> By: opci?n de la hipoteca del financiamiento http://myshingle.com/2006/08/articles/myshingle-solo/new-orleans-solos-one-year-later/#comment-2186 opci?n de la hipoteca del financiamiento Tue, 05 Sep 2006 09:45:52 +0000 http://174.120.83.8/~sh1ngl3/2006/08/articles/uncategorized/new-orleans-solos-one-year-later/#comment-2186 <strong>opci?n de la hipoteca del financiamiento</strong> radio de la tela de los brs difusi?n de la radio de la taza del mundo ropa interior de la mu?eca opci?n de la hipoteca del financiamiento

radio de la tela de los brs
difusi?n de la radio de la taza del mundo
ropa interior de la mu?eca

]]> By: opci?n de la hipoteca del fina http://myshingle.com/2006/08/articles/myshingle-solo/new-orleans-solos-one-year-later/#comment-6900 opci?n de la hipoteca del fina Tue, 05 Sep 2006 09:45:00 +0000 http://174.120.83.8/~sh1ngl3/2006/08/articles/uncategorized/new-orleans-solos-one-year-later/#comment-6900 <strong>opci?n de la hipoteca del financiamiento</strong> radio de la tela de los brs difusi?n de la radio de la taza del mundo ropa interior de la mu?eca opci?n de la hipoteca del financiamiento

radio de la tela de los brs
difusi?n de la radio de la taza del mundo
ropa interior de la mu?eca

]]> By: elguapo http://myshingle.com/2006/08/articles/myshingle-solo/new-orleans-solos-one-year-later/#comment-2180 elguapo Tue, 05 Sep 2006 04:01:04 +0000 http://174.120.83.8/~sh1ngl3/2006/08/articles/uncategorized/new-orleans-solos-one-year-later/#comment-2180 Carol, can you consider instituting a rule to stop Rjon's self-promotion? I find it really annoying and a detraction from an otherwise excellent blog. Carol, can you consider instituting a rule to stop Rjon’s self-promotion? I find it really annoying and a detraction from an otherwise excellent blog.

]]> By: elguapo http://myshingle.com/2006/08/articles/myshingle-solo/new-orleans-solos-one-year-later/#comment-6894 elguapo Tue, 05 Sep 2006 04:01:00 +0000 http://174.120.83.8/~sh1ngl3/2006/08/articles/uncategorized/new-orleans-solos-one-year-later/#comment-6894 Carol, can you consider instituting a rule to stop Rjon's self-promotion? I find it really annoying and a detraction from an otherwise excellent blog. Carol, can you consider instituting a rule to stop Rjon’s self-promotion? I find it really annoying and a detraction from an otherwise excellent blog.

]]>