<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: No malpractice insurance for blogging firms?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://myshingle.com/2007/03/articles/ethics-malpractice-issues/no-malpractice-insurance-for-blogging-firms/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://myshingle.com/2007/03/articles/ethics-malpractice-issues/no-malpractice-insurance-for-blogging-firms/</link>
	<description>Great Things Come in Small [Law] Practices!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 May 2012 18:52:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: vicodin carisoprodol</title>
		<link>http://myshingle.com/2007/03/articles/ethics-malpractice-issues/no-malpractice-insurance-for-blogging-firms/#comment-2464</link>
		<dc:creator>vicodin carisoprodol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 19:16:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://174.120.83.8/~sh1ngl3/2007/03/articles/uncategorized/no-malpractice-insurance-for-blogging-firms/#comment-2464</guid>
		<description>baby vicodin
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>baby vicodin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vicodin carisoprodol</title>
		<link>http://myshingle.com/2007/03/articles/ethics-malpractice-issues/no-malpractice-insurance-for-blogging-firms/#comment-7027</link>
		<dc:creator>vicodin carisoprodol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 19:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://174.120.83.8/~sh1ngl3/2007/03/articles/uncategorized/no-malpractice-insurance-for-blogging-firms/#comment-7027</guid>
		<description>baby vicodin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>baby vicodin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tonny</title>
		<link>http://myshingle.com/2007/03/articles/ethics-malpractice-issues/no-malpractice-insurance-for-blogging-firms/#comment-2463</link>
		<dc:creator>Tonny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jun 2007 05:20:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://174.120.83.8/~sh1ngl3/2007/03/articles/uncategorized/no-malpractice-insurance-for-blogging-firms/#comment-2463</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://sexfunbeach.com/wordpress/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://sexfunbeach.com/wordpress/&lt;/a&gt; Alexia just flew out to LA from Florida to become the latest porn sensation
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://sexfunbeach.com/wordpress/" rel="nofollow">http://sexfunbeach.com/wordpress/</a> Alexia just flew out to LA from Florida to become the latest porn sensation</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tonny</title>
		<link>http://myshingle.com/2007/03/articles/ethics-malpractice-issues/no-malpractice-insurance-for-blogging-firms/#comment-7026</link>
		<dc:creator>Tonny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jun 2007 05:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://174.120.83.8/~sh1ngl3/2007/03/articles/uncategorized/no-malpractice-insurance-for-blogging-firms/#comment-7026</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://sexfunbeach.com/wordpress/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://sexfunbeach.com/wordpress/&lt;/a&gt; Alexia just flew out to LA from Florida to become the latest porn sensation</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://sexfunbeach.com/wordpress/" rel="nofollow">http://sexfunbeach.com/wordpress/</a> Alexia just flew out to LA from Florida to become the latest porn sensation</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: renters insurance replacement</title>
		<link>http://myshingle.com/2007/03/articles/ethics-malpractice-issues/no-malpractice-insurance-for-blogging-firms/#comment-2462</link>
		<dc:creator>renters insurance replacement</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 09:50:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://174.120.83.8/~sh1ngl3/2007/03/articles/uncategorized/no-malpractice-insurance-for-blogging-firms/#comment-2462</guid>
		<description>best renters insurance
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>best renters insurance</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: renters insurance replacement</title>
		<link>http://myshingle.com/2007/03/articles/ethics-malpractice-issues/no-malpractice-insurance-for-blogging-firms/#comment-7025</link>
		<dc:creator>renters insurance replacement</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 09:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://174.120.83.8/~sh1ngl3/2007/03/articles/uncategorized/no-malpractice-insurance-for-blogging-firms/#comment-7025</guid>
		<description>best renters insurance</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>best renters insurance</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Law Vibe</title>
		<link>http://myshingle.com/2007/03/articles/ethics-malpractice-issues/no-malpractice-insurance-for-blogging-firms/#comment-2461</link>
		<dc:creator>Law Vibe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Mar 2007 14:05:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://174.120.83.8/~sh1ngl3/2007/03/articles/uncategorized/no-malpractice-insurance-for-blogging-firms/#comment-2461</guid>
		<description>Yeah, pretty wild.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, pretty wild.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Law Vibe</title>
		<link>http://myshingle.com/2007/03/articles/ethics-malpractice-issues/no-malpractice-insurance-for-blogging-firms/#comment-7024</link>
		<dc:creator>Law Vibe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Mar 2007 14:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://174.120.83.8/~sh1ngl3/2007/03/articles/uncategorized/no-malpractice-insurance-for-blogging-firms/#comment-7024</guid>
		<description>Yeah, pretty wild.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, pretty wild.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: patrick mahoney</title>
		<link>http://myshingle.com/2007/03/articles/ethics-malpractice-issues/no-malpractice-insurance-for-blogging-firms/#comment-2460</link>
		<dc:creator>patrick mahoney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2007 16:28:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://174.120.83.8/~sh1ngl3/2007/03/articles/uncategorized/no-malpractice-insurance-for-blogging-firms/#comment-2460</guid>
		<description>I suppose I should check with my surety, since my blog includes posts by me on various legal subjects that I think are pertinant to my practice area (personal injury), potential clients, and fellow practitioners.  I agree that such posts are no different that law review articles, case clips, or the like.  I suppose some sureties would argue that they are directly connected to a practioner who offers legal services so that may be a differentiating factor.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suppose I should check with my surety, since my blog includes posts by me on various legal subjects that I think are pertinant to my practice area (personal injury), potential clients, and fellow practitioners.  I agree that such posts are no different that law review articles, case clips, or the like.  I suppose some sureties would argue that they are directly connected to a practioner who offers legal services so that may be a differentiating factor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: patrick mahoney</title>
		<link>http://myshingle.com/2007/03/articles/ethics-malpractice-issues/no-malpractice-insurance-for-blogging-firms/#comment-7023</link>
		<dc:creator>patrick mahoney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2007 16:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://174.120.83.8/~sh1ngl3/2007/03/articles/uncategorized/no-malpractice-insurance-for-blogging-firms/#comment-7023</guid>
		<description>I suppose I should check with my surety, since my blog includes posts by me on various legal subjects that I think are pertinant to my practice area (personal injury), potential clients, and fellow practitioners.  I agree that such posts are no different that law review articles, case clips, or the like.  I suppose some sureties would argue that they are directly connected to a practioner who offers legal services so that may be a differentiating factor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suppose I should check with my surety, since my blog includes posts by me on various legal subjects that I think are pertinant to my practice area (personal injury), potential clients, and fellow practitioners.  I agree that such posts are no different that law review articles, case clips, or the like.  I suppose some sureties would argue that they are directly connected to a practioner who offers legal services so that may be a differentiating factor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.841 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-05-14 04:01:21 -->

