My Shingle

Are Women Fighting for Equality At Biglaw Behind the Times?

by Carolyn Elefant on August 4, 2007 · View Comments

in Biglaw Practice and Issues, MyShingle Solo, Solo Practice Trends

I was looking through some of these relatively new books on getting ahead in business and entrepreneurship that Marci Alboher reviewed in her Careers Column for the NY Times. (If you recall, I reviewed Marci’s book, One Person, Multiple Careers back here in February). What struck me about these three books – Anti 9 to 5 Guide: Practical Advice for Women Who Think Outside the Cube; The Parentpreneur Edge: What Parenting Teaches About Building A Successful Business ; and Grindhopping: Building A Rewarding Career Without Paying Your Dues – is that not only do they each have their own website (probably di rigeur for most new titles but they are all authored by women who are pushing the concept of entrepreneurship and jumping off the traditional career ladder as a way for women to get ahead. Contrast that “go get ‘em,” risk-taking mentality with the initiatives within the legal profession for advancement by women at a law firm – like begging for flex time or waiting for “the firm” to come up with ways to help women network.

All of this made me wonder whether women seeking equality at law firms are behind the times instead of on the cutting edge. Because if these books are any reflection of what’s happening in the business context, it seems that in order for women to succeed, they need to break the rules, not follow them and make their own rules instead of forcing others to change theirs.

For a previous, related post on a similar topic, see And where were the women solos?

Related posts:

  1. Big News (NOT): Starting A Firm Helps Work Life Balance
  2. Welcome New York Times Visitors to MyShingle.com!
  3. Why Are So Few Women Lawyers Solo?
  4. And Where Were the Solo Women Lawyers? (probably too busy blogging, running businesses and practicing law to complain…)
  5. Women Will Best Succeed on their Own
blog comments powered by Disqus

Previous post:

Next post: