<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Should the Law Marketing Message Fit the Medium?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://myshingle.com/2008/07/articles/marketing-making-money/should-the-law-marketing-message-fit-the-medium/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://myshingle.com/2008/07/articles/marketing-making-money/should-the-law-marketing-message-fit-the-medium/</link>
	<description>Great Things Come in Small [Law] Practices!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 15:19:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gerry Oginski</title>
		<link>http://myshingle.com/2008/07/articles/marketing-making-money/should-the-law-marketing-message-fit-the-medium/#comment-3010</link>
		<dc:creator>Gerry Oginski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 08:37:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://174.120.83.8/~sh1ngl3/2008/07/articles/uncategorized/should-the-law-marketing-message-fit-the-medium/#comment-3010</guid>
		<description>I think the stunt misses the point. Sure it&#039;ll be talked about for a few days by the locals who frequent that gas station, but here&#039;s the important question:
Is a driver needing gas going to use that law firm to solve their particular problem simply because they gave away discounted gas? In my opinion- no. How does giving away gas, or any other material object differentiate one firm from another? (I am not addressing any ethical prohibitions for giving away something of value in order to gain a client- which in New York simply cannot be done.) Again, in my opinion, it doesn&#039;t.
My suggestion and personal preference is to educate potential clients. Branding doesn&#039;t work for small law firms. Branding doesn&#039;t distinguish yourself from twenty similar law firms all doing the same type of work.
The only way, in my opinion, to distinguish one law firm from another is with education based marketing. Teach the consumer what they need to know. Explain what they need to know. It&#039;s not a secret!
I believe that by educating potential consumers of legal services, you not only target a specific market looking for your particular services, but you help educate the public at the same time.
My vote goes to educate rather than use gimmicks or branding.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the stunt misses the point. Sure it&#8217;ll be talked about for a few days by the locals who frequent that gas station, but here&#8217;s the important question:<br />
Is a driver needing gas going to use that law firm to solve their particular problem simply because they gave away discounted gas? In my opinion- no. How does giving away gas, or any other material object differentiate one firm from another? (I am not addressing any ethical prohibitions for giving away something of value in order to gain a client- which in New York simply cannot be done.) Again, in my opinion, it doesn&#8217;t.<br />
My suggestion and personal preference is to educate potential clients. Branding doesn&#8217;t work for small law firms. Branding doesn&#8217;t distinguish yourself from twenty similar law firms all doing the same type of work.<br />
The only way, in my opinion, to distinguish one law firm from another is with education based marketing. Teach the consumer what they need to know. Explain what they need to know. It&#8217;s not a secret!<br />
I believe that by educating potential consumers of legal services, you not only target a specific market looking for your particular services, but you help educate the public at the same time.<br />
My vote goes to educate rather than use gimmicks or branding.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jordan Furlong</title>
		<link>http://myshingle.com/2008/07/articles/marketing-making-money/should-the-law-marketing-message-fit-the-medium/#comment-3009</link>
		<dc:creator>Jordan Furlong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 17:20:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://174.120.83.8/~sh1ngl3/2008/07/articles/uncategorized/should-the-law-marketing-message-fit-the-medium/#comment-3009</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d argue that it&#039;s actually about branding. The promotion is nothing more than a publicity stunt -- it&#039;s a stretch to call it marketing -- but it does differentiate the firm, in small but maybe important ways, from its competitors. In a faceless sea of lawyers, the firm has positioned itself as unique in two important ways:
1. Fun-loving and irreverent -- lawyers pumping gas goes against all the stereotypes of stiff, formal, three-piece-suit professionals. Even the notion of lawyers pulling off a publicity stunt is enough to divert people&#039;s attention and change how they view these particular lawyers.
2. Populist -- this is even rarer among lawyers, who are generally identified as establishment figures. Buying gas, at a time when prices are painfully high, is a very down-to-earth, real-world, blue-collar kind of thing to do -- it&#039;s not like making a donation to the local opera house. Again, this helps position the firm in a certain light.
Now, if this is a white-collar firm that takes on a lot of corporate work, this stunt is not only pointless, but dangerous. But if it&#039;s a firm that does a lot of DUI or personal injury work, or otherwise likes to get its hands dirty, then I think it&#039;s not a bad move at all.
But I&#039;d agree that doing it once isn&#039;t enough -- it needs to be part of an ongoing effort to position the firm as the heroes of the working guy and gal. One-offs don&#039;t buy you much, in publicity stunts or marketing.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d argue that it&#8217;s actually about branding. The promotion is nothing more than a publicity stunt &#8212; it&#8217;s a stretch to call it marketing &#8212; but it does differentiate the firm, in small but maybe important ways, from its competitors. In a faceless sea of lawyers, the firm has positioned itself as unique in two important ways:<br />
1. Fun-loving and irreverent &#8212; lawyers pumping gas goes against all the stereotypes of stiff, formal, three-piece-suit professionals. Even the notion of lawyers pulling off a publicity stunt is enough to divert people&#8217;s attention and change how they view these particular lawyers.<br />
2. Populist &#8212; this is even rarer among lawyers, who are generally identified as establishment figures. Buying gas, at a time when prices are painfully high, is a very down-to-earth, real-world, blue-collar kind of thing to do &#8212; it&#8217;s not like making a donation to the local opera house. Again, this helps position the firm in a certain light.<br />
Now, if this is a white-collar firm that takes on a lot of corporate work, this stunt is not only pointless, but dangerous. But if it&#8217;s a firm that does a lot of DUI or personal injury work, or otherwise likes to get its hands dirty, then I think it&#8217;s not a bad move at all.<br />
But I&#8217;d agree that doing it once isn&#8217;t enough &#8212; it needs to be part of an ongoing effort to position the firm as the heroes of the working guy and gal. One-offs don&#8217;t buy you much, in publicity stunts or marketing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.511 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-05-16 20:21:13 -->

