David Swanner posts this excerpt from a rehearing petition that’s likely to lose. Read it and see if you can figure out why:
Statement of Issue Presented for Review: The Court of Appeals committed a major error in affirming the dismissal. The Court did not address the facts of the case. The Court has a warped perspective of the Rule of Law.
Conclusion: The Court Administration should have the case reviewed by competent individuals.
I had to read the post carefully to make sure it wasn’t some kind of premature April Fool’s joke, but it appears that the petition was actually filed.